
IRB reiterate scrum engagement procedure
The IRB have reminded referees that there should be a pause in the new scrum process even though the word has been dropped from the verbal commands: Following the introduction of the” Crouch, Touch, Set” […]
The IRB have reminded referees that there should be a pause in the new scrum process even though the word has been dropped from the verbal commands: Following the introduction of the” Crouch, Touch, Set” […]
Clarification 3: 15 November ’12 Request The IRFU seeks urgent clarification on Law 3.14(d): With the introduction of 23 player squads, is it the intention that Law 3.14(d) is applicable? We believe it should be […]
Clarification 2: 10 July ’12 Request The RFU requests clarification for the following: Law 3.11(b) A player who leaves a match because of injury or any other reason must not rejoin the match until the […]
A little late to the party but as I’ve added these previously (and I see people get to my blog looking for these,) so who am I to deny you, my loyal reader, from the […]
Clarification 1: 4 April ’12 Request The FFR request a clarification for the following: Following a kick ahead, the ball goes over the goal line and whilst it is still up in the air, a […]
Following the recent Wales v Scotland and the Wales v France games the WRU have saught clarity ove rthe end of games when there has been a score and time is close to being up: […]
Fresh from the IRB: IRB Ruling #4 2008 The RFU has requested a ruling relating to Law 17 A maul is formed with Team A pushing their opponents (Team B) back towards their own goal […]
The IRB have clarified a number of different scenarios which have cropped up in England of late: law-ruling-who-makes-it-dead-feb-08.pdf Makes sense to me!
Copyright © 2025 | MH Magazine WordPress Theme by MH Themes